by Nicholas Forst
Nicholas Forst is a second-year student at Albany Law School and the newly selected Moot Court Board Executive Chair for the 2011-2012 Karen C. McGovern Senior Prize Trials Competition.
Thanks to Professor Vincent Bonventre, our State Constitutional Adjudication Seminar was able to have dinner with two State Chief Justices: Hon. Marsha Ternus from Iowa and Hon. Jean Toal from South Carolina. This dinner was held on the eve of the Albany Law Review's Symposium titled, Great Women, Great Chiefs, where Hon. Margaret Marshall from Massachusetts joined the panel. It was a wonderful opportunity for Professor Bonventre's students, and we are extremely grateful to the Chief Justices for taking the time to sit down with us. This article contains this author's impressions from both the dinner and the Chief Justices' remarks at the Symposium.
During our time with the Justices, it became evident how each personified a different approach to legal issues in their roles as head of their respective State judiciaries--Chief Justice Toal, the Firebrand Justice; former Chief Justice Ternus, the Platonist; and retired Chief Justice Marshall, the Revolutionary. Although it may be considered overly simplistic to assign each justice a title like she is the Amazing Spiderman; the purpose behind it is to more easily qualify the fundamental platform from which their theories and actions emanate. I believe this was clearly evident in the way each Justice approached her tenure on the court and the current state of affairs in the legal field.




